What is JMS in software architecture?

JMS (Java Message Service) is an API that provides the facility to create, send and read messages. It provides loosely coupled, reliable and asynchronous communication. JMS is also known as a messaging service.

Why is Kafka better than MQ?

IBM MQ vs Kafka: Performance Factors Throughput: Kafka is recommended for applications that demand high throughput or interaction with a big data stack. On the other hand, IBM MQ is best suited for applications that require a high level of reliability and cannot tolerate message loss.

Is Kafka faster than JMS?

JMS is a general-purpose messaging solution that supports various messaging protocols. Kafka is way faster than JMS. It can handle millions of messages per sec.

What is MQ in Java?

IBM® MQ provides two alternative application programming interfaces (APIs) for use in Java applications: IBM MQ classes for Java Message Service and IBM MQ classes for Java. IBM supports, and is an active participant of, open standards and within the messaging area the API standard is the Java Message Service (JMS).

What is Java JMS used for?

The Java Message Service (JMS) was designed to make it easy to develop business applications that asynchronously send and receive business data and events. It defines a common enterprise messaging API that is designed to be easily and efficiently supported by a wide range of enterprise messaging products.

Which is better Kafka or ActiveMQ?

Kafka is way faster than ActiveMQ. It can handle millions of messages per sec. ActiveMQ supports both message queues and publishes/subscribe messaging systems. On the other hand, Kafka is based on publish/subscribe but does have certain advantages of message-queues.

How Kafka is better than ActiveMQ?

One key difference is that Kafka allows you to find messages based on their offset (similar to consuming records from a database), whereas ActiveMQ does not. Kafka also supports more advanced features such as access control using ACLs and compression using compression codecs.

Is Kafka a replacement for MQ?

As a conventional Message Queue, IBM MQ has more features than Kafka. IBM MQ also supports JMS, making it a more convenient alternative to Kafka. Kafka, on the other side, is better suited to large data frameworks such as Lambda. Kafka also has connectors and provides stream processing.